Legal Opinion

Cobb v. Lowe Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 2, 1933No. 8 Div. 456PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

The action is under the homicide statute (Code 1923, § 5696), the father suing for damages because of the death of his minor son. The trial court gave the affirmative charge for defendant.

Defendant, Lowe Manufacturing Company, maintained a drainage ditch for surface waters through its properties. It appears to have been a natural drain for this and other properties, enlarged and kept open by said company to better effect such purpose.

This drain crossed Ninth avenue, a public street or roadway in the Mill village, some 70 feet wide, including sidewalk and driveway.

Defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Athey v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Cox v. Alabama Water Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Eades v. American Cast-Iron Pipe Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Ford v. Planters' Chemical & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Moseley v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  2. Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  3. City of Dothan v. GulledgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  4. Bailey v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  5. Luallen v. Woodstock Iron Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API