Legal Opinion
Andrade v. NAACP of Austin
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided April 10, 2009No. 03-08-00076-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JAN P. PATTERSON, Justice.
Appellees NAACP of Austin, Nelson Linder, Sonia Santana, and David Van Os sought declaratory and injunctive relief against the Secretary of State for the State of Texas,1 alleging that the Secretary acted outside her statutory and constitutional authority when she certified the paperless computerized voting machine and system currently used in Travis County.2 In this interlocutory appeal, the Secretary contends that the trial court erred in denying her plea to the jurisdiction, filed on the grounds of sovereign immunity and standing. Because we conclude the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bland Independent School District v. BlueTexas Supreme Court · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Andrade v. NAACP of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- City of Arlington v. RandallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Leach v. TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
- Andrade v. NAACP of Austin, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
- City of Arlington, Texas and Alison Turner v. Mark Allen Randall, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.