Legal Opinion
Sankey v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 9, 1991No. 90-93LPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss or in the alternative, for summary judgment. Because the motion incorporated other documents, it will be considered one for summary judgment. Summary judgment is appropriate only when there are no material issues of fact so that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. RUSCC 56(c); Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. United States, 812 F.2d 1387, 1390 (Fed.Cir.1987); Hendricks v. United States, 10 Cl.Ct. 703, 706 (1986). For purposes of this *744motion, the court will view all evidence…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Litton Industrial Products, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Solid State Systems Corp., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Arakaki v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Westlands Water District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Navajo Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Hatter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.