Legal Opinion
People ex rel. Baldwin v. Goldfogle
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 19, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Application by Baldwin and others for writ of prohibition to Henry M. Goldfogle, justice of the district court. Denied.
1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.
The writ of prohibition is a state writ (Code Civ. Proc. § 1991), and, as stated in the note of the commissioner in Throop’s Code:
“It issues only to courts and judicial officers, acts only upon legal proceedings pending before those tribunals, almost invariably involves pure questions of law, and aims only to procure a stay of proceedings.”
As said by the commissioner:
“It was thought that this writ had survived its practical utility, and that all the practical benefits of the writ might be obtained by means of an injunction. * * * The Laws of 1873 (chapter 70) provided for the extension of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Livermore v. HamiltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- In re WhiteNew York Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by3 opinions
- Quinn v. QuinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Simon v. SchmittCity of New York Municipal Court · 1909
- Parkison v. Victor, JudgeOhio Court of Appeals · 1957