Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Baldwin v. Goldfogle

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Application by Baldwin and others for writ of prohibition to Henry M. Goldfogle, justice of the district court. Denied.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

The writ of prohibition is a state writ (Code Civ. Proc. § 1991), and, as stated in the note of the commissioner in Throop’s Code:

“It issues only to courts and judicial officers, acts only upon legal proceedings pending before those tribunals, almost invariably involves pure questions of law, and aims only to procure a stay of proceedings.”

As said by the commissioner:

“It was thought that this writ had survived its practical utility, and that all the practical benefits of the writ might be obtained by means of an injunction. * * * The Laws of 1873 (chapter 70) provided for the extension of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Livermore v. HamiltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  2. In re WhiteNew York Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Quinn v. QuinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Simon v. SchmittCity of New York Municipal Court · 1909
  3. Parkison v. Victor, JudgeOhio Court of Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API