Legal Opinion

Nutz v. Murray-Nutz, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 19, 1931PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bobine, J.

The appellant, A. W. Crone & Son, Incorporated, for convenience called Crone Company, had the general contract for erecting the new state normal school in Jersey City. The insolvent Murray-Nutz, Incorporated, for convenience called Nutz Company, had the subcontract for plastering work in the building. This subcontract was originally with Nutz & Reier, a partnership, but was assigned. George K. Nutz was the active man in the partnership and the corporation.

When the receiver of Nutz Company was appointed Crone Company owed that company…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. North Chicago Rolling Mill Co. v. St. Louis Ore & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Wagner v. BurnhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Karno-Smith Co. v. MaloneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  2. Central Surety And Insurance Corporation v. Martin Infante Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  3. In Re Flanagan Bros., Inc., DebtorUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1985
  4. Graybar Electric Co., Inc. v. Continental Cas. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  5. Gallant v. Fashion Piece Dye WorksNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API