Legal Opinion

Ketcham v. International Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 15, 1948No. 15,905PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Luxford

This is a proceeding by a beneficiary to compel a trustee to pay a certain sum of money to him direct instead of investing it in an annuity policy for his benefit as provided by the express terms of testator’s will. The judgment being against him, the beneficiary brings the case here, contending: (1) That the court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment; (2) that plaintiff, as a matter of law, is the only person beneficially interested in this fund, and (3) that plaintiff, as a matter of law, may demand and receive payment of his proportionate share of the trust estate…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pitman v. Colorado National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  2. In Re the Estate of ColeNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Parker v. CobeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  4. American Bible Society v. CameronSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  5. Bedell v. ColbySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morgenthaler v. First Atlantic National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  2. Maytag v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  3. The First National Bank of Denver, Trustee of the Barry M. Sullivan Trust v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  4. Maytag v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API