People ex rel. 711 Corp. v. Chambers
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Since the Appellate Division order fails to make the specifications required by section 602 of the Civil Practice Act, we are compelled to presume that questions of fact were not considered and to “ treat the Appellate Division order as being a determination on the law only ” (People ex rel. Sheffield Farms Co. v. Lilly, 295 N. Y. 354, 356; Rochette & Parzini Corp. v. Campo, 301 N. Y. 228). So regarded, the order cannot be sustained. Questions of fact as to the value of the premises during the taxable years in question are presented by the record. The order is accordingly reversed, without…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rochette & Parzini Corp. v. CampoNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- People Ex Rel. Sheffield Farms Co., Inc. v. LillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
3Cited by2 opinions
- People ex rel. 711 Corp. v. ChambersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- People v. MackNew York Supreme Court · 1976