Legal Opinion

People ex rel. 711 Corp. v. Chambers

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 18, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Since the Appellate Division order fails to make the specifications required by section 602 of the Civil Practice Act, we are compelled to presume that questions of fact were not considered and to “ treat the Appellate Division order as being a determination on the law only ” (People ex rel. Sheffield Farms Co. v. Lilly, 295 N. Y. 354, 356; Rochette & Parzini Corp. v. Campo, 301 N. Y. 228). So regarded, the order cannot be sustained. Questions of fact as to the value of the premises during the taxable years in question are presented by the record. The order is accordingly reversed, without…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rochette & Parzini Corp. v. CampoNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. People Ex Rel. Sheffield Farms Co., Inc. v. LillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1946

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. 711 Corp. v. ChambersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  2. People v. MackNew York Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API