Legal Opinion

State v. Grady

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 30, 1993No. 92-2042-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.

Keith L. Grady appeals his conviction for violating section 941.20(2) (a), Stats, (endangering safety by use of a dangerous weapon), as a party to a crime, see section 939.05, Stats. He contends that the trial court improperly instructed the jury on an element of the crime. We affirm.

I

The facts essential to this appeal are not contested. After a dispute between Grady and the grandmother of Grady's child, during which Grady was shot by a third person, Grady and some others returned to the grandmother's house and fired several rounds at the house from their car. According to Grady's statement…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. EhlenfeldtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. SeldersCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Rene Jaimes-JaimesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  3. State v. KENDELL G.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. McCoySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Weina Ex Rel. Peyton v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API