State v. Grady
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.
Keith L. Grady appeals his conviction for violating section 941.20(2) (a), Stats, (endangering safety by use of a dangerous weapon), as a party to a crime, see section 939.05, Stats. He contends that the trial court improperly instructed the jury on an element of the crime. We affirm.
I
The facts essential to this appeal are not contested. After a dispute between Grady and the grandmother of Grady's child, during which Grady was shot by a third person, Grady and some others returned to the grandmother's house and fired several rounds at the house from their car. According to Grady's statement…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. EhlenfeldtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. SeldersCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Rene Jaimes-JaimesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- State v. KENDELL G.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- Commonwealth v. McCoySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Weina Ex Rel. Peyton v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.