Legal Opinion
City of Malden v. Union Electric Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 6, 1989No. Nos. 88-2129, 88-2399PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LARSON, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff, the City of Malden, Missouri, appeals from the district court's 1 entry of judgment in favor of defendants Union Electric Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Missouri Utilities Company, in this antitrust action challenging defendants’ refusal to transmit power to plaintiff under a favorable tariff the city had negotiated with Missouri Utilities. Plaintiff claims the jury’s verdict in favor of defendants is against the great weight of the evidence, the trial court’s instructions to the jury were erroneous, and defense counsel’s prejudicial remarks…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Otter Tail Power Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Arthur Ray PARHAM, Appellant, v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Malden, Missouri v. Union Electric Company and Missouri Utilities Company, City of Malden, Missouri v. Union Electric Company and Missouri Utilities CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Midamar Corp.v. National-Ben Franklin Insurance Co. of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Midamar Corporation v. National-Ben Franklin Insurance Company of Illinois and Marine Office of America Corporation, Midamar Corporation v. National-Ben Franklin Insurance Company of Illinois and Marine Office of America CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990