Legal Opinion

Hauger v. Benua

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1899No. 18,573PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Erran the "Washington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

This was an. action for libel by appellant against- appellee. The complaint was in five paragraphs. A demurrer for want of facts was sustained to the fifth paragraph of complaint. Appellee filed an answer of justification in three paragraphs. Appellant’s demurrer for want of facts to each paragraph of the answer was overruled. The cause was tried by a jury, and a, verdict returned in favor of appellee, and, over a motion for a new trial, judgment was rendered against appellant.

The errors assigned call in question the action of the court in sustaining the demurrer to the fifth paragraph of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wenning v. TeepleIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. NoftsgerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Roller v. KlingIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Heilman v. ShanklinIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Fenstermaker v. Tribune Publishing Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Nickey v. SteuderIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Scott v. City of LaporteIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. FretzIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Tombaugh v. GroggIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Breedlove v. BreedloveIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API