Legal Opinion

Moudy v. BOYLAN

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, J.,

(Pro Tempore)

This is an action for damages for personal injuries arising out of an automobile collision between a car which the plaintiff, Ella M. Moudy, was driving and one being driven by the defendant Marvin K. Boylan.

The jury returned a verdict for the defendant, and after a motion for new trial was denied, the plaintiff brought this appeal.

The principal question involved is whether the trial court should have instructed the jury that the defendant was negligent as a matter of law, that his negligence proximately caused the collision, and that the plaintiff was not guilty of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Foster v. FarraOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Cockerham v. PottsOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. White v. KELLER ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Cooper v. North Coast Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Doty v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ewing v. IzerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Stone v. StoneOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Ewing v. IzerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Jepsen v. MagillOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Smith v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API