Legal Opinion
Dollar General Stores, Ltd. v. Smith
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided November 1, 2007No. 2005-SC-000867-DGPublished
1Opinion of the Court
237 S.W.3d 162 (2007)
DOLLAR GENERAL STORES, LTD., Appellant
v.
Mabel Rose SMITH, Appellee.
No. 2005-SC-000867-DG.
Supreme Court of Kentucky.
November 1, 2007.
Kevin G. Henry, Kevin W. Weaver, Sturgill, Turner, Barker & Moloney, PLLC, Lexington, KY, Counsel for Appellant.
Jonathon N. Amlung, Amlung Law Offices, PLLC, Louisville, KY, Counsel for Appellee.
Opinion of the Court by Chief Justice LAMBERT.
We have held that the saving provision of KRS 413.270 applies as well to improper venue selection as to jurisdictional error.[1] However, we have not previously decided whether the saving statute applies…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- American Dredging Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Duncan v. O'NANCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
- Troxell v. TrammellKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
- Fritsch v. CaudillKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.