Pettit v. Coachman
Supreme Court of Florida
This case was decided by Division A. Appeal to the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, J.
On May 19, 1904, the appellant, Col-lions I. Pettit, a married woman, filed in the Circuit Court for Hillsborough county a bill in chancery against S. S. Coachman and S. A. Pettit, husband of the appellant. The bill alleges that on June 10, 1908, the defendant, S S Coachman, began a suit in the Circuit Court for Hillsborough county against S. A. Pettit and recovered judgment thereon by default on September 4th, following, said judgment being for the sum of $204.21 and costs; that thereafter certain real estate described in the bill was advertised for sale under execution by the sheriff of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Waterman v. HigginsSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
- Claflin & Thayer v. AmbroseSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
- American Freehold Land & Mortgage Co., of London, Ltd. v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
- Hill ex rel. Giddens v. MeinhardSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
- Edward Nalle & Co. v. LivelySupreme Court of Florida · 1875
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Weathersbee Et Ux. v. DekleSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Trueman Fertilizer Co. v. StephanSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Taylor v. Hastings Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Florida · 1919