Legal Opinion

McNeel v. Texas N. O. R. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 16, 1932No. 2261PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Suit by Mrs. McNeel to recover $5,000 in her own right, and as next friend to recover for James McNeel, her minor son sixteen years of age, the sum of $10,000, damages alleged to have occurred by reason of the negligence of the appellee railroad. The several acts of alleged negligence were fully and adequately pleaded.

Appellee answered by general demurrer, general denial, and specially that the injuries of plaintiff James McNeel were the direct and sole result of his own negligent acts, fully setting forth the acts relied up on. Appellee also specially answered that appellant James McNeel was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Trochta v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of TexasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  2. Texas Mexican Ry. Co. v. HoyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  3. Robinson v. Houston Belt & Terminal Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Murphy v. MilheiserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. of Texas v. CheekCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dr. Pepper Bottling Co. v. Rain-BoldtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Edmiston v. Texas N. O. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Jacobs v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API