Florence & Cripple Creek Railroad v. Kerr
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Fremont District Court. Hon. Charles A. Wilkin, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtTeller, J.
The plaintiff in error seeks to reverse a judgment recovered by defendant in error in an action based upon the alleged negligence of the former.
We shall refer to the parties as they were designated in the trial court.
The plaintiff was a brakeman in the employ of the D. & R. G. Ry. Co., and on the night of his injury, at about *541eleven o’clock, alighted from a freight train on Ninth Street in Canon City, that he might signal to the engineer of his train when the rear car had cleared a certain switch. The defendant had a track, crossing said street, near the track upon which plaintiff’s train was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. BarronSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. WarnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
- Fisher v. JansenIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Walker v. Erie Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1872
- Catlett v. Colorado & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mile High Fence Co. v. RadovichSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
- Shaw v. Pacific Supply CooperativeOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Goldstein v. SklarSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
- Krause v. Watson Bros. Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1948
- Colorado Utilities Corp. v. CasadySupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.