Legal Opinion

Lincoln Rapid Transit Co. v. Rundle

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1892PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Chapman, J. Sawyer & Snell, and Marquett, Reweese

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Ch. J.

This is an action of ejectment brought in the district court of Lancaster county by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error to recover possession of lots 7, 8, and 9 in block 38, in Dawson’s addition to Lincoln. The answer of the defendant below is in substance a judgment in the United States circuit court. On the trial of the cause the jury returned a verdict in favor of Rundle, and for $100 damages, and a motion for a new trial having been overruled, judgment was entered on the verdict.

*560Rundle claims title through a conveyance from Editha J. Dawson, who derived…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murray v. BallouNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
  2. Little v. GilesNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Little v. GilesNebraska Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cooper v. OvertonTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Hadley v. CoreyNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Clark v. CharlesNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Orr v. BroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Martin v. AbbottNebraska Supreme Court · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API