Legal Opinion

Wald v. Lenox Avenue & 140th Street Corp.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided January 25, 1950Published

1Opinion of the CourtChimera, J.

Plaintiffs, a firm of attorneys, sne on two canses of action — 1. professional services rendered, and 2. account stated. These are four separate actions involving substantially the same facts and for convenience tried as one single case.

On or about December 28, 1948, plaintiffs and defendant in each of the actions entered into an agreement in writing reading as follows:

“ The undersigned hereby retains Wald, Husin, Miller, Levy & Davis to obtain an increase of rent from the Office of Housing Expediter of Premises, in behalf of the undersigned Corporations;
“ I [defendants] agree to pay them for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Matter of Kramer Uchitelle, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Lorillard v. . ClydeNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. F. T. B. Realty Corp. v. GoodmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. Quaker Oats Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  5. Alfred Marks Realty Co. v. Hotel Hermitage Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API