Legal Opinion

Borough of Prospect v. Bauer

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 12, 1998No. 261 C.D. 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

The issue before this Court is whether the doctrine of collateral estoppel applies when a change in the law has occurred.

Franklin Township (Franklin) appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Butler County that granted the motion for summary judgment filed by the Borough of Prospect (Prospect) and James E. Bauer (Pittsburgh Parts-A-Rama) on the basis of collateral estoppel. We reverse and remand.

Franklin and Prospect are adjacent municipalities in Butler County. The Butler Fair and Agricultural Association (Butler Fair) owns 150 acres that straddles both…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bowles v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Keystone Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. In re Appeal of DavisCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Muretic v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Hershey's Mill Homeowner's Ass'n v. Chester CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API