Legal Opinion

United States v. Storm

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided December 31, 2012No. Case No. 3:11-cr-00373-SIPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SIMON, District Judge.

Defendant Logan Storm (“Storm”) is charged with one count of knowingly possessing images of child pornography, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2256(8), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B) and (b)(2). Storm has filed three motions to limit the jury’s ability to view images of child pornography and other images that the Government seeks to introduce in evidence and publish to the jury. Storm’s three motions are captioned: (a) Motion in Li-mine to Stipulate that Images Constitute Child Pornography and Not Be Exhibited to the Jury (Dkt. 64); (b) Motion in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon. Com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. Kevin Eric CurtinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. Alexander Montagu HayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Morales-AldahondoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API