Legal Opinion

People v. Kidd

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided May 16, 2019No. E070996PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRaphael, J.

*14After being charged with several felony offenses, defendant and respondent Martell Shimon Kidd was twice unsuccessful in having the *15evidence against him suppressed on motions brought pursuant to *237Penal Code1 section 1538.5, first at the preliminary hearing and then after his arraignment on the information. He raised the suppression issue again, however, in a motion to set aside the information pursuant to section 995, which was heard by a different superior court judge. This time, Kidd was successful; the section 995 motion was granted on the ground that the evidence against him should be…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. DKN Holdings LLC v. FaerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  5. People v. SouzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. TacardonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
  2. People v. Bernalramirez CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. People v. Cho CA6California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. People v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. People v. KasrawiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API