Legal Opinion

Atlanta Transit System, Inc. v. Hines

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 21, 1976No. 52140PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Presiding Judge.

1. Six enumerations of error go to the general grounds. The record shows that appellee, a minor, was riding on appellant’s bus with his arm out the window. It is uncontested that the bus had made a regular start with no jerks, jolts or unusual movements and the bus itself made no contact with the pole.

Appellant carrier was bound to exercise extraordinary diligence for the appellee’s safety. Code §§ 18-102, 18-204. Extraordinary diligence is that extreme care and caution which very prudent and thoughtful persons exercise under the same or similar circumstances; the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. Frye v. PyronCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. State Highway Department v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  4. Citizens Coach Co. v. CollierSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  5. Fisher v. Louisville Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bradham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Big Bend Agri-Services, Inc. v. Bank of MeigsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Bravis v. DunbarCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  4. Farley v. PriestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API