Legal Opinion
Simmons v. Pinsky
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 10, 1945PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
George H. Taylor, Jr., Official Referee.
This is a reference to hear and determine. The action is in equity, brought by the plaintiff to restrain the conduct of what plaintiff claims is a hotel and what the defendants Pinsky and Gartenberg assert is merely a boarding house at Lake Mohegan, Town of Yoi’ktown. The ground of action is that defendants are violating the zoning ordinance (Building Zone Amended Ordinance of 1941 of the Town of Yorktown) (cf. Rice v. Van Vranken, 225 App. Div. 179, 180, 181, affd. 255 N. Y. 541).
The property of plaintiff adjoins that of defendants on the east. Both…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rice v. Van VrankenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Rice v. Van VrankenNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Empire City Subway Co. v. Broadway & S. A. RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- Dixon v. RobbinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Waitt Construction Co. v. ChaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- CITY OF GULFPORT, MISS. v. DanielsMississippi Supreme Court · 1957
- Hickerson v. FlanneryCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
- MIC General Insurance Corporation v. CabreraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021