Legal Opinion

State v. Pulliam

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 3, 1985No. 8515SC404PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Defendant’s only assignment of error is the denial of his motion to dismiss, at the close of all the evidence, the charges of possession of LSD with intent to sell or deliver and sale or delivery of LSD. The motion to dismiss challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and must be granted unless there is “substantial evidence of all material elements of the offense in order to create a jury question on defendant’s guilt or innocence.” State v. Locklear, 304 N.C. 534, 538, 284 S.E. 2d 500, 502 (1981). When ruling on a motion to dismiss, the court is required to consider the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. RozierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. . GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. State v. AlbartySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. WallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  2. State v. MercerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. CromartieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  4. State v. SladeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. FinkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API