State v. Cromartie
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Judge.
*791 Daryl Lee Cromartie ("Defendant") appeals from judgment entered upon his convictions for attaining habitual felon status, common law robbery, misdemeanor larceny, fleeing to elude arrest, resisting a public officer, and simple assault. Defendant argues the trial court erred by: (1) admitting Deputy Snyder's prejudicial and inadmissible hearsay into evidence; (2) failing to arrest judgment for the larceny and assault convictions; and (3) failing to dismiss the charge of resisting an officer where no evidence satisfied the allegation in the indictment. For the reasons discussed,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. CoffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HarperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023
- State v. HussainCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023
- State v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023
- State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026