Legal Opinion

Strimling v. McDonald

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 15, 1926No. 25,738PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action by the assignee thereof to foreclose a second mortgage on a Minneapolis apartment house property, known as Inverness Court. The Bankers National Bank of Minneapolis, hereinafter referred to as the bank, appeals from an order appointing a receiver of the rents and profits pending the action.

There was a first mortgage, originally for $77,000, under the foreclosure of which for the remaining debt of $73,926.45 the period of redemption will expire November 9, 1926. In addition thereto and senior to plaintiff’s second mortgage are liens of mechanics and ma-terialmen, said to aggregate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. CadySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  2. Ganley v. City of PipestoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  3. Nielsen v. HealdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. WurtzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. Larson v. OrfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. MeesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API