Legal Opinion

State v. Chacon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 23, 1994No. 10-92-03788; CA A76783Published

1Per curiam

Defendant pled guilty to unlawful possession and delivery of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He appeals the length of the post-prison supervision term. The state argues that, because defendant pled guilty pursuant to a plea agreement, review is precluded under State v. Adams, 315 Or 359, 847 P2d 397 (1993), and State v. Johnston, 120 Or App 165, 851 P2d 1156 (1993), rev den 317 Or 272 (1993), and that the 1993 amendment to ORS 138.222(2)(d) does not assist defendant.

We do not address the scope of our review under the amended provision. Defendant concurred in the 36-month post-prison…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State v. McEahernCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API