Legal Opinion

In Re AEP Erisa Litigation

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided July 12, 2006No. C2-03-67PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND OPINION

MARBLEY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the Court on the Motion for Class Certification by Plaintiff, Kermit D. Bridges (“Bridges” or “Plaintiff’). 1 Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff seeks to certify a class defined as:

the Plan, and all Participants in the Plan for who individual accounts the Plan purchased and/or held shares of the AEP Stock Fund at any time from December 9, 1998 to December 31, 2002, inclusive (the “Class”)

Plaintiff also seeks an order certifying him as the Class Representative and an order…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Daily Income Fund, Inc. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Vartanian v. Monsanto CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  4. Wooden v. Board of Regents of the University System of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  5. T.J. Kennedy v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Patterson Companies, Inc. SecuritiesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
  2. Register v. Cameron & Barkley Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API