Legal Opinion
Klickstein v. Neipris
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 23, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
The plaintiff seeks in this action of contract to recover rent for November and December, 1931, and January, 1932, at the rate of $62.50 for the demised premises. Undisputed facts are that the plaintiff and defendant entered into a written lease of the premises for the term of one year commencing April 1, 1929, and ending March 31, 1930. The lease contained the following words: “with the option to renew this lease for two years more at the expiration hereof, yielding and paying therefor the rent of eight hundred ten dollars ($810.00) per year for the first year in *93equal monthly payments- of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cunningham v. PatteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Leavitt v. MaykelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Judkins v. CharetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Shannon v. JacobsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Wit v. Commercial Hotel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mutual Paper Co. v. Hoague-Sprague Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Marble v. Town of ClintonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- O'BRIEN v. HurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
- S. S. Kresge Co. v. SearsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936
- HLM Realty Corp. v. MorrealeMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.