Legal Opinion

Van Den Eng v. Cigna Life. Ins. Co.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided April 9, 2004No. 01-C-664Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

GRIESBACH, District Judge.

This case, which was removed to this court from state court, arises under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. The plaintiffs are beneficiaries of Patrick J. Van Den Eng, now deceased, under a group universal life insurance plan (GUL) established by Fort James Corporation pursuant to a group insurance contract issued by Cigna Life Insurance Co. 1 to Fort James Corporation. The crux of the dispute is whether plaintiffs are entitled to the additional insurance amount that Van Den Eng requested prior…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Claude Wardle, Sr. v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  4. Paul E. Black v. Tic Investment Corp. Stratton Georgoulis, Individually and James H. Slife, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Gordon B. Phillips, as Guardian of James G. Phillips v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API