Legal Opinion

Barker v. Wood

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1928No. 13,018Published

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

Action in replevin for a number of hogs which appellant had placed with one Stone for sale, said Stone being in . the business of buying and selling hogs in the city of Indianapolis, appellee having purchased the- hogs from Stone.

From a judgment for appellee, this appeal is prosecuted. Appellant assigns as error the court’s action in overruling his motion for a new trial. Appellee forcefully contends that nothing is presented because of failure of appellant to comply with the rules of the court in the preparation of his briefs. ■ But, in any event, appellant cannot prevail.

The evidence shows…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Preston v. WitherspoonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Hirsch v. NortonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. First National Bank v. JosefoffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Earle v. Fletcher American National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API