Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Thompson

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 1, 2013No. AC 35134Published

1ConcurrenceLavine, J.

A prosecutor’s excessive use of the word “victim” is objectionable when the commission of a crime is at issue “because prevalent use of the term may cause the jury to draw an improper inference that the defendant committed a crime against the complainant.”State v. Warholic, 278 Conn. 354, 370 n.7, 897 A.2d 569 (2006); see also State v. Victor O., 301 Conn. 163, 191 n.11, 20 A.3d 669, cert. denied, 565 U.S. 1039, 132 S. Ct. 583, 181 L. Ed. 2d 429 (2011). It is properly disfavored and can form the basis, depending on the circumstances, of a prosecutorial impropriety claim.

It is, however,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WarholicSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. State v. VICTOR O.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  3. State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API