Shown v. Getty Oil Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before CADENA, C.J., and CANTU and BASKIN, JJ. BASKIN, Justice.
This appeal involves the construction of an oil, gas and mineral lease provision commonly known as a Pugh clause. Appellants, plaintiffs below, sued the defendants for a release of an oil and gas lease, to remove cloud from title, to recover title and possession and to enjoin the defendants from operations on non-unitized lease premises. The defendants denied the allegations and pleaded for declaratory judgment that the lease remain in full force and effect.
The material facts of the case are undisputed, and the parties…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Woods v. SimsTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- Fox v. ThoresonTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- McMahon v. ChristmannTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Company v. MastersonTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Fawvor v. US Oil of Louisiana, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hydrocarbon Management, Inc. v. Tracker Exploration, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1993
- Krabbe v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001
- Egeland v. Continental Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. Pool, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000
- Mayfield v. Benavides, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.