Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Siegel-Cooper Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided April 15, 1900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Equity

1Opinion of the Court

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

It is possible, though highly improbable, that two persons, neither of whom had even seen or been informed of the other’s design, might have produced packages as similar as the two before the court. But there is no dispute that the designer of the Van Duzer package had complainant’s before him when he undertook to prepare his own. As is invariably the case when these suits come into court, there is an affidavit of the designer of the later package to the effect that his entire effort “was to individualize our own goods.” Quite possibly an interested party may so…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. N. K. Fairbank Co. v. R. W. Bell Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
  2. Saxlehner v. Eisner & Mendelson Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. O. & W. Thum Co. v. DickinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  2. Wolf Bros. v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  3. Saratoga Vichy Spring Co. v. Saratoga Carlsbad Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  4. Al-Fab Aluminum Fabricators, Inc. v. WagnerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1963
  5. Cauffman v. SchulerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API