Legal Opinion
Hertz v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided September 15, 2000No. A-7279PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
0 P I N I 0 N
STEWART, Judge.
On December 10, 1998, Sidney R. Hertz filed a complaint in the Anchorage Superior Court entitled "Application for Writ of Habe-as Corpus for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel." On December 31, 1998, Superior Court Judge Elaine M. Andrews issued a suc sponte order that directed Hertz to refile his complaint as an application for postconviction relief under Criminal Rule 35.1. Hertz claims that Judge Andrews erred by issuing this order. We disagree and affirm the order of the superior court.
Facts and proceedings
In 1984, Sidney R. Hertz was indicted on one count of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Felker v. TurpinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Kills on Top v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1995
- Taggard v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hertz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2001
- Fisher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2013
- Lambert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2002
- Olson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2016