Legal Opinion
Porter v. Beha
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 17, 1926No. 305PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
What we consider the dominant and controlling facts of this litigation have been stated with fullness, because, after reflecting on the exhaustive arguments submitted, we are of opinion that the acts of the parties have rendered irrelevant most of the propositions of law discussed. The final facts proven by the evidence may be thus summarized:
On February 7th Niagara Insurance Company could not lawfully make a contract. The normal exercise of its business and corporate functions had been stopped by the injunction procured and served by the insurance…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hopkins v. Clemson Agricultural College of South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- In Re ChetwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Tindal v. WesleySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Lankford v. Platte Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- In re Carnegie Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Skandia America Reinsurance Corp. v. SchenckDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CavicchiaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- North Carolina Ex Rel. Long v. Alexander & Alexander Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1989
- Gruber v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1958
- In Re Fidelity Assur. Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.