Legal Opinion

Schoenfeld v. Blair

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 31, 1961No. 39261PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELCH, Justice.

This appeal is by defendant Schoenfeld from an adverse judgment for damages to personal property resulting from a collision between automobile driven by defendant, and trailer house being pulled by Kenneth R. Blair, son of plaintiff.

The only question raised by defendant on appeal is that the evidence of plaintiff is not sufficient to sustain the verdict, because plaintiff not shown to be proper party plaintiff.

In his argument defendant contends that evidence did not prove plaintiff to be the owner of damaged property, and that she was wrong party plaintiff. He cites Jantzen v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jantzen v. Emanuel German Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Sunshine Oil Co. v. ChantrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Helmerich & Payne, Inc. v. KeeneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Schmidt v. NashSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mainord v. SharpCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
  2. Cary by and Through Cary v. Oneok, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Cary by and Through Cary v. Oneok, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API