Legal Opinion

In re the Claims of Burger

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 1951PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

There is substantial evidence in the record before us to support the factual finding of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that these claimants-respondents lost their employment involuntarily and not because of a strike, lockout, or other industrial controversy in the establishment in which they were employed (Labor Law, § 592, subd. 1). Accordingly that finding is binding upon us (Labor Law, § 623; Matter of Morton, 284 N. Y. 167, 171). We pass on no other issue. Specifically, we reserve the question whether the regular pattern of work of longshoremen, checkers and harbormasters, viewed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Claim of MortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Matson Terminals, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Matter of Villa Maria Inst. of MusicNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Matter of Ferrara (Catherwood)New York Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Lascaris v. WymanNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Lascaris v. WymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. In re the Claims of VingoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API