Bituminous Casualty Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant v. Advanced Adhesive Technology, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant, Georgia Pad, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HATCHETT, Circuit Judge:
Following Georgia law in this diversity case, we hold that a pollution exclusion provision in a commercial liability insurance policy is ambiguous and must be construed against the insurer. We affirm the district court.
BACKGROUND
Appellee Advanced Adhesive Technology, Inc. (Advanced) manufactures and sells adhesive products. Appellant Bituminous Casualty Corporation (Bituminous) sold Advanced a general commercial liability insurance policy (GCL policy) effective from January 1, 1993, to January 1, 1994. Bituminous also issued an umbrella insurance policy to Advanced…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Claussen v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus, Georgia, a Georgia Corp. v. United States Fire Company, and Boston Old Colony Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Alley v. Great American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Krug v. MILLERS'MUTUAL INSURANCE ASS'NSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- Perkins Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Bituminous Casualty Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Meridian Mutual Insurance Company v. Roslyn E. Kellman, Skender Bajrami, Individually and Doing Business as Kopliku Painting CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. WoltersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Technical Coating Applicators, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Western Alliance Insurance v. GillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Terra International, Inc. v. Mississippi Chemical Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.