Seamans v. Temple University
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DALZELL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Edward M. Seamans (“Sea-mans”) sues defendant Temple University (“Temple”) for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681s-2(b). Temple filed a motion for summary judgment. As Temple’s motion requires the little construed intersection of the Higher Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., with the FCRA, we necessarily must write at some length.
I. Factual Background
The parties do not dispute that in 1989 Seamans received a $1,180.00 Perkins student loan from Temple. Stip. Facts (docket entry # 13) ¶ 1. Seamans stopped…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Horsch v. Wells Fargo Home MortgageDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Hillis v. Trans Union, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Thomas v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025