Legal Opinion

Ingevity Corp. v. MAHLE Filter Systems North America, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 7, 2023No. 1:18-cv-06158Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION INGEVITY CORP. and ) INGEVITY SOUTH CAROLINA, LLC, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) No. 18 C 6158 v. ) ) Judge Sara L. Ellis MAHLE FILTER SYSTEMS NORTH ) AMERICA, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION AND ORDER On September 7, 2018, Plaintiffs Ingevity Corp. and Ingevity South Carolina, LLC (collectively, “Ingevity”)1 filed this action against Defendant MAHLE Filter Systems North America, Inc. (“MAHLE”), asserting that MAHLE infringed Patent No. RE38,844 (the “’844 Patent”) through the sale of certain fuel vapor canisters. Shortly after…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Special Devices, Inc. v. Oea, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  4. Modine Manufacturing Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. The Allen Group, Inc., D/B/A the G & O Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  5. Mother and Father v. James CassidyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API