Legal Opinion

Willard v. Ostrander

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from Trego District Court. The opinion states the nature of the action and the material facts. Judgment for defendant, Ostrander, at the September term, 1888. The plaintiff, Willard, brings the case to this court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Green, C.:

This was an action upon a promissory note, executed by John M. Ostrander, on the 2d day of September, 1885, to Frank G. Willard, for the sum of $965, payable in 1 year and 11 months after date, with interest at 12 per cent, per annum. The answer of Ostrander admitted the execution of the note, but alleged that it was given in part payment for a flock of sheep purchased of Willard; that Charles Weeks, the duly-authorized agent of Willard, sold and delivered to Ostrander 2,173 head of sheep for $5,358, and warranted them to be sound, healthy, and free from all *592disease; that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grace v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Hawkins v. HawkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Van Ostrand v. ReedNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  4. Wren v. HoffmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Castleman-Blakemore Co. v. Pickrell & Craig Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Ehrsam v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. Willard v. OstranderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  4. Hazelton v. ChaffinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  5. Griesa v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API