Legal Opinion

St. Johnsbury & Lake Champlain Railroad v. Hunt

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 15, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

AotioN on the case for stopping the plaintiff’s cars. Heard on demurrer to the defendant’s special pleas, June Term, 1887, Yeazey, J., presiding.

Read the full summary

AotioN on the case for stopping the plaintiff’s cars. Heard on demurrer to the defendant’s special pleas, June Term, 1887, Yeazey, J., presiding. The court considered that, although the defendant might lawfully have caused his process against Collins to be served by arresting his body, if the officer could have got at him on the train, or off the train at the station when the train stopped without interference of the officer or in his behalf, regardless of the damages to the plaintiff, yet Hunt and his officer had no right to stop the train in order to get at Collins to serve this cival…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Powers, J.

This case was heard upon a general demurrer-to the defendant’s third special plea. The declaration in substance charged that while the plaintiff was lawfully and properly operating its railroad in running a train of which Collins was *592the engineer, its engine struck and injured a heifer of the defendant there by the fault of the defendant, wrongfully upon its track, and the defendant knowing he had no legal cause of action against the plaintiff, for the purpose of injuring the plaintiff and delaying and hindering the operation of the railroad,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brunswick & Western Railroad v. PonderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Gross v. Gates, Auditor of AccountsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  3. Weissengoff v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1919
  4. Thomas v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Thomas v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API