Legal Opinion

Gademsky v. Masset

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 17, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Motion for counsel fees, costs and disbursements and cross motion for counsel fees, costs, disbursements and sanctions denied. Memorandum: We decline to award either party counsel fees and costs or to impose financial sanctions pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1. It cannot be said that either party has engaged in frivolous conduct (see, 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [c]). Furthermore, an application for an award of appellate counsel fees should be addressed to Family Court (see, Family Ct Act § 651 [a]; Domestic Relations Law § 237 [b]; Matter of O’Neil v O’Neil, 193 AD2d 16, 18). Present—Lawton, J. P.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. O'Neil v. O'NeilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ashley v. DelarmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Sunrise Nursing Home, Inc. v. FerrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. SUNRISE NURSING HOME, INC. v. FERRIS, MARIONAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Sunrise Nursing Home, Inc. v. FerrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API