Ritzman v. Burnham
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Wáldo M. York, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This is an action brought to recover damages for the conversion of certain horses. Defendant recovered judgment and plaintiff appeals. Among other reasons given by the respondent why the judgment should not be reversed is the claim that the complaint states no cause of action. As I think the claim must be sustained, it will not be necessary to mention other points.
The complaint is not in the usual form for conversion, but proceeds with the narration of certain alleged facts. *524After an interesting narrative which does not concern this case, it states that defendant sued plaintiff before a…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Sullivan v. GageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Thomas v. Superior Court, Etc.California Court of Appeal · 1907
- People ex rel. Emmerson v. LeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
- Hochheimer & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924