Legal Opinion

Graham Packaging Co. v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 2005PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEADBETTER.

Petitioner Graham Packaging Company, L.P., petitions for review of the order of the Board of Finance and Revenue (Board), which denied its request for a refund of the sales tax it paid in connection with the renewal of various “canned” computer software licenses in October 1999.1 The issue on appeal is whether fees paid to renew the licenses to use the software programs are taxable under Section 202 of the Tax Reform Code of 1971 (Code), Act of March 4, 1971, P.L. 6, as amended, 72 P.S. § 7202. In order to resolve this issue, we must answer the fundamental question…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Advent Systems Limited, in No. 90-1069 v. Unisys Corporation, in No. 90-1070Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  2. Catalina Marketing Sales Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. First National Bank of Fort Worth v. BullockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Globe Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. South Cent. Bell Telephone v. BarthelemySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dechert LLP v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Dechert LLP v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. DECHERT LLP v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Downs Racing, LP v. Commonwealth of PACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Victory Bank v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API