Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Jotham

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 12, 2006No. A05-438PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, PAUL H„ Justice.

This case involves a probate proceeding arising out of the death of respondent Diann Nelson’s father, Leonard Jotham. Nelson seeks, for purposes of determining intestate succession, to introduce evidence to rebut the presumption that Jotham is the father of appellant Sandra Barnett, which presumption is found in section 257.55, subdivision 1, of Minnesota’s Parentage Act. Minn.Stat. § 257.55, subd. 1 (2004). The district court concluded that the statute of limitations in Minn.Stat. § 257.57, subd. 1(b) (2004), bars Nelson from challenging the paternity…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. Martin Ex Rel. Hoff v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. In Re Nicholas H.California Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Wingate v. Estate of RyanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  5. Morey v. PeppinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Powell v. DicksionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  2. Laymon v. Minnesota Premier Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  3. In re the Estate of NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  4. A. S. v. K. C.-W. (In re C. F. N.)Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
  5. IN RE: ESTATE OF ROBERT C. MURRAYNevada Supreme Court · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API