Legal Opinion

People v. Hertz Driveurself Stations, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1953No. Docket 71, Calendar 45,732PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Hertz Driveurself Stations,. Inc., defendant, referred to herein as Hertz, was.charged by the People-of the State of Michigan, plaintiff, referred to herein as the State, with leasing, licensing •or permitting the use of certain motor vehicles reg istered in its name by Associated Fruit & Produce' Company, Inc., herein referred to as Associated, over the highways of the State of Michigan without a contract carrier permit first being obtained from the Michigan public, service commission and contrary to the provisions of PA 1933, No 254, art 3, § 1 et seq., as amended (being CL 1948, § 477.1 et…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rohan v. Detroit Racing AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Grand Rapids Motor Coach Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. CareyMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State ex rel. Schroath v. CondryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. City of Corpus Christi v. McClaughertyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  4. Mildred L. Smith v. Indemnity Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
  5. State v. Southwest Lumber Mills, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API