Legal Opinion

Harris v. Quick

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 29, 2022No. 6:20-cv-00282Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA DONNIE L. HARRIS, JR., ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV 20-282-RAW-KEW ) JIM FARRIS, Warden, ) ) Respondent. ) OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Petitioner’s motion to conduct discovery pursuant to Rule 6 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. (Dkt. 35). Under Rule 6(a), “[a] judge may, for good cause, authorize a party to conduct discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and may limit the extent of discovery.” Pursuant to Rule 6(b), however,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API