Legal Opinion

United States of America, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Peter Lubertazzi

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 5, 1960No. 13303_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.

Appellant’s sole complaint before us arises out of the irresponsive comment of a witness while on the stand.

The indictment charged appellant with receiving and selling stolen motor vehicles, 18 U.S.C. § 2313, and with conspiracy to transport stolen motor vehicles in interstate commerce, 18 U.S.C. § 371. He was convicted of all three offenses and sentenced to three years imprisonment under the conspiracy count with similar concurrent sentences on the other counts.

Originally five defendants had been named in the indictments. Three of these pleaded guilty on May 22,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. State v. WitteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  4. Robert Joyner White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
  5. United States v. MaggioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Kenny Derosa A/K/A Pup, in No. 76-1642 Appeal of Brando Rosetta, in No. 76-1643Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. DavisDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1966
  3. United States v. BarboneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  4. United States v. BasenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. United States v. BarboneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API