Legal Opinion

All Metro Health Care Services, Inc. v. Edwards

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 2009PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Marcy S. Friedman, J.

In this action, plaintiffs All Metro Health Care Services, Inc. (AMHC) and the 1818 Mezzanine Fund II, L.P. (1818 Fund) seek damages for defendants’ alleged fraud in connection with the sale to AMHC of All Metro Aids, Inc. (All Metro Aids), a corporation engaged in the business of home health care. Plaintiffs AMHC and 1818 Fund move to discontinue the action so they can proceed with arbitration of their claims against defendant Scott R. Mixer, and to compel arbitration of all of Mixer’s claims against plaintiffs.

The following facts are not disputed:…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Thomson-Csf, S.A. v. American Arbitration Association, Evans & Sutherland Computer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. Citizens Bank v. Alafabco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Leadertex, Inc. v. Morganton Dyeing & Finishing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. BDO Seidman, LLP v. J.A. Green Development Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
  2. BDO Seidman, LLP v. SSW Holding Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  3. Citigroup Smith Barney v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. iPayment, Inc. v. GraingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  5. SERVAAS INC. v. Republic of IraqDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API